######################################## #Written by David Tam, 1997. # #davidkftam@netscape.net Copyright 1999# ######################################## David Tam Monday, January 13, 1997. Business Press Review ===================== "Hummingbird to switch to U.S. accounting rules". The Globe and Mail. Thursday, January 9, 1997. B16. ------------------ Hummingbird Communications Ltd., a small Toronto-based software company, has decided to switch from Canadian to U.S. accounting rules. Hummingbird will report financial results in U.S. dollars and follow the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States. A number of reasons for this action were mentioned. Because Hummingbird plans to purchase an existing company in March, rules for distributing this expense (the matching principle) are more advantageous under the U.S. system. The company may charge most of this expense against its revenues within a year. Under the Canadian system, this expense must be distributed over a number of years. Although not explicitly mentioned, I believe these factors would allow for Hummingbird to record a lower profit for the initial year (reducing taxes owing to the government), and then showing a quick recovery the following years. Under the Canadian system, the expense of the business acquisition would dampen reported profits for several years. Hummingbird's portion of revenues and assets derived from the United States have also increased, providing more reason for the change of accounting systems. This article deals with GAAPS, specifically on the issues of matching principle and consistency as (supposedly) covered in the second lecture. As mentioned under the consistency section of the course notes, "There are occasions when a business entity can select a different method of accounting. Once this method is selected then it should be retained from period to period to ensure comparability." Hummingbird has decided to switch accounting methods for many valid reasons. However, I believe they may have a few initial difficulties because of the major changes needed. Also, the ease of comparability between future and past financial records may pose problems.